You Are Here !
Britain & Europe




Free Speech ??
Use It - Or Lose It !!

Writing / Wall
The Writing On The Wall

Related Articles

Political Correctness How To Fight Political Correctness - AND WIN !!!

Kensington & Chelsea Councillors & Wards
 
BNP News Bulletins
European Union European Union
Index
Multiculturalism

UK Elections 2004
UK Elections 2005
UK Elections 2006
UK Elections 2007
UK Elections 2008
UK British European Elections 2009

Understanding The European Arrest Warrant

Tyranny is coming to Europe in the form of a new multicultural empire

Tony Blair accused of treason over Europe

Corpus Juris
The European Union proposal to abolish trials by jury


Yea to the Nej Swedes won't take the euro

How our legal system is being destroyed by stealth

Sir James Goldsmith - Britain Is Sleepwalking Into A European Superstate

CORPUS JURIS
by Ralph Maddocks


IMPORTANT  No opposition to Euro Superstate allowed

Edward Heath / Monetary Union & Sovereignty Downplayed in Euro Talks

UKIP given £170,000 to quit Europe

Say Goodbye to England

Behind Corpus Juris

Why Europe Needs Britain

What Will Happen To Pensions

Europe: Founding members have rejected its proposed constitution

The British have nothing to gain from becoming part of Europe, but they have everything to lose

Keep The Pound

On the 1st May ten Eastern European countries will become new members of the European Union

PROTECTING BRITAIN AGAINST GLOBALISATION - VOTE GREEN FOR LOCALISATION

FREE BRITAIN A Complete List of Euro-Sceptic Web Resources

FPRI Blair, Britain, Europe and International Relations?

Joining euro 'would wreak havoc on housing'

EU Cannot Be Serious! The Truth About Europe Say NO To Europe And The Euro

The Maastricht Treaty introduced little known aspects of EU integration referred to as co-operation between member states in justice and home affairs

WHEN does it make sense to join a currency union ?

European attitudes towards America have turned chilly of late. France, a member of the U.N. Security Council, continues to spar with the U.S. over Iraq

A Napoleonic System of Repression Now Confirmed in Corpus Juris

The primary concern of any Christian minister should be the Truth

BNP Information Appeal / Whistleblowers BNP Whistleblowers
Articles On Political Correctness Articles Of Interest
London Calling Forums London Calling Forums
Britain In Europe Britain Europe & The Euro
Chapter Index Chapter Index
Free Speech & Anti Political Correctness This Websites Site Map
Nationalist Links Nationalist - Anti PC Links
Notting Hill Carnival 2010 & Slavery Notting Hill Carnival 2010
Israel Iraq War Palestine Iraq War - Israel Palestine
UK Elections 2010 UK British - Elections 2010
Portobello Gold Portobello Gold Notting Hill
NewsRoom Sean Bryson's NewsRoom
News Bulletins Special News Bulletins
Free Speech Hosting Free Speech Web Hosting
Download Files The Downloads Page
SBTV Internet Television & Radio SBTV Internet TV & Radio
Pages Of Image Links


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Sean Bryson   Edward Heath / Monetary Union & Sovereignty Downplayed in Euro Talks
FREE ADVERTISING
In Online Newspaper Notting Hill London UK
From  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_depth/uk/2000/uk_confidential/1094207.stm Europe


Edward Heath:
1970 victory prompted EEC entry talks

 

Monday, 1 January, 2001, 00:39 GMT
UK downplayed sovereignty in Euro talks

Edward Heath

Documents disclosed under the 30-Year Rule reveal that the most controversial European issue of today - monetary union - was already being discussed at the highest levels of government in 1970 as the UK sought entry to the club. When Edward Heath took power in June 1970, everyone knew that his main foreign policy goal was to succeed where Harold Wilson before him had failed, and gain a place for the UK in the European Economic Community.

The UK's attempts to join the European project had twice been brushed aside by the then six-strong community. But by 1970 the way appeared open.

Implications

Joining the Common Market, as it then was, had significant implications for Parliament and the UK's wider relationship with the Commonwealth nations.

But government papers disclosed for the first time reveal that the new Conservative prime minister's view was to get in, and get in fast.

PREM 15/62: Highlighted sovereignty issues


In July 1970, a memo to the prime minister from a cabinet office official put the point clearly.

"The longer these negotiations drag on, the less their prospect of success and the whole process is brought into public disrepute," wrote the official.

But crucially, the document indicated how officials were already thinking - and warning the politicians of the battles that could lie ahead.

"It may become necessary to project, some picture of the future development of the Community, if only because the very absence of such a picture gives rise to fears of the (supranational) unknown that are even now being exploited."

And in a hand-written note on top of the memo to Mr Heath, an official added: "Prime Minister, the ore important point is perhaps to consider whether we are equipped to think beyond the current "grocer's shop" stage.

We ought to give forethought to the implications for the political institutions and sovereignty."

In an interview for the programme, Sir Edward Heath said that as negotiations began, he saw problems in the UK losing momentum.

"The problem is explaining to the public the intricacies of joining another organisation which has had many years in building up its structure.

"They were not going to change their structure to take us in."

"Their attitude towards us"

But how were the other members regarding the UK's approach for membership?

FCO 30/770: Embassy advised on strategy


The UK's then ambassador in Paris, Christopher Soames (later Lord Soames), had a good idea of the French view, according to disclosed documents. "We must not underestimate the impact which the Government's handling of the issues at home will have upon negotiations," he wrote to Foreign Secretary Sir Alec Douglas-Home.

"What has puzzled and dismayed French public opinion is the fact that so little has been done to far to try to evoke real enthusiasm in Britain for of Europe."

The ambassador said that the French saw the British (and particularly the previous Labour government) as being obsessed with the costs of entry.

"The figure we have cut so far is less that of a people determined to board the European train than that of a somewhat nervous passenger on the platform whose skirt has somehow got caught up in the door."

Difficulties at home

While Paris was urging an enthusiastic and visonary approach, domestic political considerations pulled the government in another direction.

Ministers and officials concurred that the negotiating stance had to avoid appearing too enthusiastic and "insufficiently hard-headed".

So was the government deliberately playing down future issues such as monetary union?

PREM 410/4: Werner Plan known to ministers


At the negotiating table, they could hardly be avoided as Brussels had already devised what became known as the Werner Plan, a proposal for monetary union. According to the senior British officials who saw it, the plan "could imply the ultimate creation of a European federal state with a single currency.

"It will arouse strong feelings about sovereignty and provoke vigorous discussions."

"Everyone wanted to approach these monetary issues with extreme caution and the less they came out in the open, the better," Sir Crispin Tickell, one of the UK's negotiators at Brussels, told UK Confidential.

"But the argument in London was don't let's talk about this in public because we don't know what effects it would have on sterling.

"In other words the bread and butter issues are appropriate for a negotiation of this kind and when we're in, then we can discuss the longer-term questions."

For his part, Sir Edward Heath rejects suggestions that the government deliberately buried the prospect of monetary union as "propaganda".

"When I first negotiated with Harold Macmillan as prime minister, in my opening speech I said that our purpose was to join a community which was going to be full.

"I emphasised that the first part is not the question of trade and goods but the nature of the relationship between the countries and this was to be wholehearted.

"I've emphasised that point in every speech I've made."

Different course of action

And yet the same leading civil servants who predicted possible fallout from public discussion of Werner, proposed a different course of action.

"It will continue to be advantageous to HMG to avoid taking any attitude on the detail of the Werner proposals," they advised. In other words, don't say unless your asked.

But, speaking today, Sir Edward said that his government's approach to entering the EEC was less about pulling the wool over the eyes of the British public, and more about the pragmatic benefits of gaining entry and taking a stake in Europe's future.

"Sovereignty is something you can use for your own good," he told UK Confidential.

"By putting our share of sovereignty into the Community, we are able to share in all its benefits, otherwise we couldn't.

"The other members put their share of sovereignty into the community as well and we share that."