|    
                        
                           | 
                      
                        
                           
                            HOW 
                              And WHY Whites 
                                
                              Are 
                              Made GUILTY ! | 
                           
                         
                       | 
                     
                   
                    
                  Is the multicultural campaign really about diversity? Or is 
                  it about stamping out Western civilization and the “white 
                  race” itself? 
                  College students will tell you that a university 
                    education today is a guilt trip for whites. 
                    The purpose is to prevent whites from appreciating and absorbing 
                    their 
                    own culture and to make it difficult for whites to resist 
                    the unreasonable demands (quotas, reparations, etc.) from 
                    “people of color.”   
                  To the questions, “who am I, what am I,” the 
                    white university graduate answers: 
                    “a racist, sexist, homophobic oppressor.”  
                  Neither parents, trustees, alumni, nor the public are aware 
                    of the anti-white propaganda that masquerades as education. 
                    When someone who is aware tells them, they think the person 
                    is exaggerating in order to make a point. 
                  Now comes Harvard educated Noel Ignatiev, an academic at 
                    Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute 
                    for African-American Research. Dr. Ignatiev is the founder 
                    of a journal, Race Traitor, 
                    which has as its motto, “treason 
                    to whiteness is loyalty to humanity.” 
                  The journal's purpose 
                    is 'to abolish the white race.' 
                   
                  At the least, Dr. Ignatiev intends cultural and psychological 
                    genocide for whites. It is unclear whether physical extermination 
                    is part of the program. A statement by the editors on the 
                    web site says that the new abolitionists  
                  “do not 
                    limit themselves to socially acceptable means of protest, 
                    but reject in advance no means of attaining their goal.” 
                   
                  Dr. Ignatiev does not believe his agenda is controversial. 
                    He writes:  
                   
                  “The 
                    goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable 
                    that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur 
                    any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” 
                    Thus does he put whites on 
                    notice. If they oppose their abolition, 
                    they are “white 
                    supremacists.” 
                   
                  According to Dr. Ignatiev,  
                  “The 
                    key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish 
                    the white race.”  
                   
                  
                     
                      |  
                         “Make no mistake about it,” he says,  
                        “we 
                          intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the 
                          live ones, and the females too, until the social construct 
                          known as ‘the white race’ 
                          is destroyed,not ‘deconstructed’ 
                          but destroyed.” 
                         | 
                        | 
                       
                        
                       | 
                     
                   
                  
                  What “social construct” will be left? A black 
                    one? An Hispanic one? Muslim? Asian? What about Jewish? 
                  The Washington Times reports 
                    that Dr. Ignatiev is himself Jewish. If Jewish intellectuals 
                    and Israeli political leaders can be believed, Jews have a 
                    cultural and racial consciousness. Israel is the Jewish homeland, 
                    and Israelis seem determined to keep it that way. Can 
                    anyone imagine a gentile at an Israeli university founding 
                    a magazine devoted to abolishing the Jewish race? 
                  Yet, Dr. Ignatiev believes that it is self-evident that whites 
                    in their homelands should be abolished.  
                  Where did he get this view? His only education was at Harvard where he 
                    received two graduate degrees.  
                  Is Harvard embarrassed? No. Dr. Ignatiev [ignatiev@fas.harvard.edu] 
                    is showcased in the current issue of Harvard Magazine. 
                    Getting rid of whiteness is not controversial at Harvard, 
                    because it is the business of American universities.  
                  A white skin, you see, is a mark of privilege. It is 
                    not the privilege of being admitted to Harvard even though 
                    you don’t meet the entrance requirements. It is not 
                    the privilege of being hired independently of ability because 
                    of government enforced racial quotas. It is 
                    not the privilege of being able to sue whites and 
                    “white 
                    companies” if blacks are not proportionately represented 
                    in the work force. It is not the privilege of being able to 
                    call whites every name in the book and sue if a white replies 
                    in kind. 
                  The privilege of being white is that whites can secretly 
                    believe they are superior and, as long as they don’t 
                    mention it, be loyal to the white race.  
                  “The white race is like a private club,” says 
                    Dr. Ignatiev. 
                  I am sure Dr. Ignatiev is well-informed, but I see no signs 
                    of this white loyalty. Most of the multiculturalists 
                    and radical 
                    feminists are white. Whites disadvantaged whites by imposing 
                    racial quotas. Despite widespread opposition to quotas, neither 
                    “white” political party will act to stop unconstitutional 
                    quotas, which have made a mockery of equality under law. 
                    Whites are inundated 
                    by massive non-white immigration, and neither “white” 
                    political party will act to restrain immigration. To the contrary, 
                    both parties pander to the immigrants. 
                  But Dr. Ignatiev has an idea like Hitler. A race is guilty 
                    and must go. The communists said 
                    it was a guilty class that had to go.  
                  If you thought genocide was left behind in the 20th century, 
                    be apprised that today genocide has a home in the educational 
                    system. 
                  Paul Craig Roberts is the co-author with Lawrence M. Stratton 
                    of The Tyranny 
                    of Good Intentions: How Prosecutors and Bureaucrats Are Trampling 
                    the Constitution in the Name of Justice 
                  COPYRIGHT CREATORS SYNDICATE, 
                    INC. 
                  September 04, 2002 
                    
                    |