BNP UPDATE

http://www.bnp.org.uk

mail@bnp.org.uk
PO BOX 51, Oundle,
PE8 6WQ
TEl 0700 900 2671

TEL: 0906 5532245
BNP Info Line latest BNP news Regularly updated, calls cost £1(one pound) per min.

FREEDOM - DEMOCRACY - SECURITY - IDENTITY

Please take the time to read the article below which appeared in The Times yesterday. This is exactly what the BNP has been saying for years only to be shouted down, vilified and persecuted. The fact that such an item can appear in a newspaper like The Times is a graphic example of how the liberal establishment and belief in multiculturalism is collapsing. The other article from the BBC online website is most interesting if you substitute the word "white" for "black".

The Times
7/08/02
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,7-376133,00.html

Is immigration in Britain out of control? Our correspondent, an immigrant's son, says it is — causing social tension, cultural clashes and economic strain

A well-known commentator once told me: “It is almost a case of the empire strikes back.” But it’s not just the former empire, it is pretty much the entire Third World and Eastern Europe. About a quarter of a million people are coming to Britain from the Third World each year: a city the size of Cambridge every six months, an unprecedented and sustained wave of immigration to one of the world’s most densely crowded islands, utterly transforming the society in which we live against the wishes of the majority of the population, damaging quality of life and social cohesion, exacerbating the housing crisis and congestion, and with questionable economic benefits.

I know knee-jerk accusations of racism and xenophobia will be fired at me by those who make careers out of suppressing legitimate debate, but I am hardly anti-immigrant or anti-immigration. I am the son of an immigrant, living with an immigrant, from such a family of émigrés that I have virtually no relatives in this country. I have had three serious relationships with British Indians, to the extent of visiting relatives in India. Most immigrants — including my mother and partner — make a great contribution to society. Immigration, allowing people to better their lives where they see the best opportunity, is a great force for good in the world.

The unprecedented wave of immigration from the poor world to Britain is leading to huge and rapidly growing communities from almost every Third World country. There are a million Indians, almost 700,000 Pakistanis, 260,000 Bangladeshis, up to a million Nigerians, over 100,000 Iraqis. And numbers are increasing rapidly — in the past five years, while the white population grew by 1 per cent, the Bangladeshi community grew by 30 per cent, the black African population by 37 per cent and the Pakistani community by 13 per cent.

The number of people allowed to settle permanently in the UK has more than doubled in the past few years, reaching 125,000 in 2000 — almost all from the Third World and Eastern Europe. The number being given British citizenship doubled to 100,000 last year, nine out of ten of them from the Third World.

The route of entry is irrelevant. Whether it is usually-unfounded-and-never-get-deported asylum, arranged marriages, bringing over parents, grandparents, children or fiancés, holiday visas that mean never going home, temporary work visas that inevitably lead to citizenship five years down the line, or simply a clandestine ride in the back of a lorry, the effect is the same. Almost all are certain to stay. Thirteen times as many people emigrate from the Indian subcontinent to the UK than vice versa, three times as many from the Caribbean to the UK than vice versa. This net immigration, the largest yet witnessed in Britain, is quadrupling the rate of Britain’s population growth, taking it to the highest levels since the 1960s.

Don’t be fooled by the immigration celebrationists telling you that this is just history as normal. It isn’t. Earlier waves of immigration, from the Huguenots to the Jews after the Second World War, to East African Asians in the 1970s, were one-off events that had an ending. The populations who came and did well for themselves were genuinely being forced out of whence they came. We were right to welcome them.

But what is happening now is the result of sustained migration pressure the likes of which the world has never seen before. For the first time, the world has huge disparities of wealth, widespread knowledge in the poor world of how the rich world lives and how to get there through TV and global telecommunications, and cheap, quick worldwide transport. It is easier for them to get here, and far more difficult to make them leave: the revolution in “human rights” means that as soon as anyone gets past passport control they are pretty much guaranteed to stay. More than 47,000 illegal immigrants were detected in 2000, but just 6,000 were sent home.

Economics is clearly the ultimate motivation, because it is from the poor world that all the record net immigration to the UK is coming. With the rest of the developed world, Britain has pretty much zero net immigration — almost as many people move from the rest of the developed world to Britain as vice versa each year. We should not delude ourselves: it is sustained, one-way, large-scale, economically-driven mass immigration, with no end in sight.

There is nothing wrong in itself with economic migration, exercising the right to find a better life — after all, the Europeans have been world champions, colonising North America, Australasia and parts of South America and southern Africa. But the European emigration of earlier centuries was largely morally unacceptable because it was not, to put it mildly, achieved with the consent of the host populations.

The fact is that life for most people in the Third World is hard, and life in the West a fantastic dream that families are prepared to blow a lifetime’s savings to make real in whatever way we allow them.

The Afghan couple raided in a mosque and now being deported are claiming asylum from a regime that no longer exists, having travelled through and decided that they didn’t want to stay in three other countries en route to Britain. Life under the Taleban was unimaginably awful, but now they would rather just live in Britain than help to rebuild their home country.

A neighbour of mine emigrated from Bangladesh 30 years ago, bringing over his non-English-speaking wife. His older son has now just brought over his second non-English- speaking wife from Bangladesh, having divorced the first. He picked them up while spending six months of the year on the family farm in Bangladesh, where they have staff working for them. They will no doubt in time also bring over husbands for his two teenage sisters, and then they will have rights to bring over the spouse’s parents and grandparents. These are all individual private acts that in themselves are perfectly reasonable, but taken by so many individuals they have huge public consequences. Such powerful chain migration effects ensure that immigration will continue relentlessly, bringing whole communities from the Third World to Britain. Whole villages in Bangladesh have been transplanted to whole streets in some northern English towns: little Third World colonies in Britain.

Its abolition of the primary purpose rule, meaning that it is now OK to have an arranged marriage for the primary purpose of emigrating to Britain, made it possible to bring in boyfriends and girlfriends and scrapped passport exit controls. It actively encouraged universities to recruit tens of thousands of students from the Third World and dramatically increased temporary work visas in the full knowledge that many will stay.

Most notoriously among doctors, the Government has introduced the Human Rights Act, giving anyone who gets into Britain, whether legally or illegally, the right to free NHS treatment for the rest of their lives if they have a life-threatening condition for which they can’t get treatment at home. It is no coincidence that African immigration has overtaken gay sex as the biggest cause of HIV in Britain. Putting The British FIRST www.bnp.org.uk Any of the 28 million HIV-positive Africans, facing inevitable death at home, can obtain free treatment for the rest of their lives if they can just get into Britain, and then appeal under the Human Rights Act. The booming industry of legal aid funded immigration lawyers will do their paperwork for them.

The boom in immigration has been matched only by the determination of immigration celebrationists to brainwash the British public into thinking that it is all for their own good. But almost every reason given to support this immigration is bogus.

Britain doesn’t have a declining population — there are more births than deaths each year; it doesn’t have a declining workforce, largely because women’s retirement age is rising to 65 by 2020; as recognised by every authority from the Immigration Advisory Service to the United Nations and the European Commission, immigration is no “fix” for an ageing society, because immigrants grow old too; there are no generalised labour shortages, rather unemployment of 1.5 million; importing communities who are far more likely to claim all forms of benefit apart from pensions and disability allowances, and who can have startlingly high unemployment rates, does not make Britain a richer country. It is, in fact, importing poverty.

Immigration increases the size of the economy — how could it not? — but there is no evidence that it increases the one measure that matters, gross domestic product per capita. There are some shortages of skills, but only a tiny proportion of immigrants is plugging those gaps.

Sure, immigrants contribute more in taxes than they consume in benefits, but that is only because there are so many highly paid immigrants such as American bankers and European executives paying more than their share. Immigrants from the Third World — who are responsible for the entire net immigration of a quarter of a million a year — suffer higher unemployment and lower earnings than average and almost certainly do not pay their way.

The only reason for this net current immigration is not that Britain needs immigrants, but that immigrants want Britain. It is not even particularly good for the countries they come from. Stealing the most energetic, entrepreneurial or educated from the Third World is a very inefficient development policy.

The one thing it does do is change the face of Britain, rapidly. One child in eight is now from an ethnic minority, rising to one in three in London. So-called “ethnic minorities” together form a majority in boroughs such as Brent and Newham, and in whole neighbourhoods of cities in the North you can wander around for hours without seeing a white face, one monoculture having replaced another. Cities such as Coventry, Leicester and London are vying to see which can become the first white-minority city.

The British paper Muslim News compared Bradford with Belfast, with deeply entrenched divisions ripping a community apart and creating wounds that may be becoming impossible to heal. In Bradford, as in Belfast, the communities live apart, work apart, socialise apart and occasionally riot. Muslim peers advise that disillusioned British Muslim youths are in danger of being recruited to extremist organisations, and the secret services think that around 3,000 may have trained with al-Qaeda.

There are roughly two million Muslims in Britain, most of them fine people, but mass immigration is increasing the numbers rapidly before we have learnt how to ensure that their children feel part of wider society and reach their full potential. Similarly, we have record levels of immigration from Africa, even though there is a widespread problem of young black men becoming increasingly alienated and criminalised. It is an uncomfortable fact that we have to face up to: mass immigration without integration leads to social fragmentation.

It is certainly changing Britain. A Middle Eastern immigrant, who is now passionately British, told me: “This is not the country I came to in 1958. Britain is losing Britain in a fit of absent-mindedness. It is utter madness what is going on, and even many immigrants feel this.” A Lebanese family friend who lives in Nigeria says she cannot believe that Britain is just letting itself go.

If there are more people wanting to live in Britain than we can feasibly accept, then Britain has to tell people they cannot move here. We have to accept that people just do not have the right to live where they want in the world, and that the people of Britain have a right to decide who can move here. Wanting open borders is a noble aim, but not while there are such global imbalances in wealth that it causes destabilising population flows.

Obviously we should do more to help Third World countries to become places where people want to live rather than leave; it is unacceptable that we sit by and watch the entirely preventable Aids holocaust consume almost an entire continent. But the solution is to treat people where they live, rather than the limited number who find their way to Britain. The solution is to help Third World economies to become more vibrant rather than to steal their most energetic and entrepreneurial people.

And the irony is that this wave of immigration pressure, which will forever change the face of Britain, will itself come to an end. As the Third World becomes richer — as is happening in India and China — the incentive to move here will erode. Puerto Ricans used to move to America, until a slight rise in wealth in Puerto Rico stemmed the flow. But by the time that the Third World no longer wants to move to Britain, Britain will be a foreign land.

Black ( White ) activists plan 'political assault'

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2175903.stm

Campaigners are vowing to turn up the heat on the government as they press for action to increase the number of black ( White ) faces in front-line politics. A series of rallies are being planned alongside Black ( White ) History Month in October, followed by a march in London next April to coincide with the 10th anniversary of the death of the black ( White ) teenager Stephen Lawrence. ( Gavin Hopley and many other un / under reported dead White victims of Black racists ) View HERE

* The campaign is described as "the country's first political assault to serve notice on politicians that they are unrepresentative and not listening to the concerns of the nation's black ( White ) people".

And organisers say that, with US civil rights activist Rev Al Sharpton and Marcus Garvey Jnr, son of black ( White ) nationalist leader Marcus Garvey invited to take part, the campaign can learn from the US civil rights movement.

Alienation
It is being organised by Operation Black ( White ) Vote, the National Assembly Against Racism and the 1990 Trust. They want to see steps taken to help reverse alienation with politics in the black ( White ) community and efforts to increase the number of black ( White ) MPs. Simon Woolley, head of Operation Black ( White ) Vote, says the black ( White ) community is not apathetic, but that there is "deep frustration with the fine words of politicians". He said: "It is not just New Labour, but the government has not delivered. The only radical reform that has come out of Downing Street is for women only. "It is about getting them to be bolder and more honest. You cannot say 'we want change', then not have the willingness to see the project through."

Talent
Mr Woolley said all political parties could immediately take action to restore some confidence in the black ( White ) community by putting
"black ( White ) faces in high places". "They could hand pick black ( White ) talent and put them in power," he said. "It's not rocket science. "There should then be a programme of recruitment, retention and promotion of black ( White ) talent." He acknowledges that the UK now has its first black ( White ) Cabinet minister in Paul Boateng, but adds: "When Boateng came in he said 'don't judge me by my colour only'. "His reticence over wearing his colour on his sleeve was because the system doesn't allow black ( White ) politicians to talk about the black ( White ) struggle."

Burden
"If a black ( White ) politician talks about black ( White ) politics it is seen as single issue politics, yet a white ( Black ) politician like Kate Hoey can comfortably give support to the Countryside Alliance and also be taken seriously on women's issues." That, Mr Woolley says, is "symptomatic of the burden of the black ( White ) politician". He went on: "We have used the carrot, working with (Labour chairman) Charles Clarke, Iain Duncan Smith and Charles Kennedy on this. "We are happy to continue working with them, but now we reserve the right to use the democratic stick and politically force the issue. "Everybody can benefit from our success. We are not separatist with a warped agenda - it is about asking for a slice of the cake."

Note
Perhaps potential Black politicians should address the huge amount of Black crime, and the huge number of Anti White racist Black muggers
That combined with a reduction in the ever enduring accusation of RACIST, thrown at white people when ever possible, would do more long term good for Black people than any of the above. Youth and especialy the Black youth of today, needs to be educated about the truth of the African Slave Trade, and the fantastic accomplishments of Western / White culture and civilisation.