of John "Birdman" Bryant
One of the most difficult of all things to endure for
a crow, a raven, a wolf, or a human is to feel alone and
separated from one's own kind. A sense of belonging is
one of the most universal of all feelings. --Lawrence
Kilham (1989), quoted in Candace Savage, Bird Brains:
The Intelligence of Crows, Ravens, Magpies, and Jays,
Sierra Club, 1995: 61
In the present day the term racist is usually considered
an insult, and hardly a day goes by without some white
man saying how horrible he thinks racism is or apologizing
for the racism of his ancestors. More than this, many
acts presumed to be motivated by racism have now been
made illegal, and others which are already illegal are
given enhanced penalties when motivated by racism. But
white racism -- which happens to be the only kind denounced
by our wonderful liberal media, which gives a pass to
the racism of blacks, hispanics, Jews and that of just
about every other group -- is not only defensible, but
actually desirable, while the opposing anti- racist liberal
philosophy which advocates "equality", "integration",
"tolerance" and "multiculturalism"
is not only bad for most of those affected by it, but
is in fact preparing the ground for the breakup of our
nation on the rocks of racial strife.
To begin, let us ask what is generally meant by the term
racist -- excluding, that is, the implication that those
to whom it applies are somehow "evil". The answer
is evidently something along the following lines:
A racist is a man who honors his race, reveres his ancestry,
prefers -- like virtually everyone -- to be with his own
kind, and believes that his genetic inheritance is worth
preserving in the same way that liberals believe that
the spotted owl, snail darter, American Indians and Australian
aborigines are worth preserving.
From this definition it can be seen that there is nothing
whatsoever the matter with being a racist, and indeed
that if liberal logic is followed in the case of the spotted
owl and Australian aborigines, then liberalism is compatible
with every sort of racism -- not that liberals would follow
their own logic, or any logic, for that matter.
Now it is true that racists are sometimes accused of
"hate" in their attitude toward other races,
and it must be admitted that there are probably some racists
who do hate the members of other races in some fashion
or another. Hate, however, has nothing to do with racism
per se: While a man may love or care about his own race,
this does not mean that he has any special negative feelings
about other races, any more than a man who loves his family
can be said to hate other families.
But if hate is not a part of racism per se, there is
obviously an emotional distance between the feelings a
man has for his own race and the feeling he has about
the races which are not his own -- feelings which in some
cases may be positive, in some indifferent, in some negative
in one degree or another. And there is a very simple explanation
for these feelings: If a group survives, this means its
members have a special feeling for one another which keeps
the group together, and thus a fortiori excludes outsiders.
In fact, the success of a group's survival as a group
is proportional to the intensity of the positive feelings
which the members have for the group, and thus is proportional
to the intensity of the negative feelings which the members
have for other "competing" groups. Or to put
it another way, negative feelings about other groups --
including hate -- are nature's way of insuring group survival.
Thus we see that every group from families to nations
depends on "love" for the group by the members
and "hate" (in a relative sense) of other groups
and their members.
In ordinary circumstances, group "love" and
group "hate" are rarely evident in any population,
but they do become evident -- and in fact can become extremely
intense -- in circumstances in which the group is threatened.
In wartime, for example, the enemy is often depicted as
morally depraved monsters; but when the war is over, normal
relations resume in which the former enemy becomes "normal".
Certainly this situation occurred in both World Wars,
the Cold War and the Viet Nam War.
Among those most often thought to exhibit race "hatred"
are "rednecks", "skinheads", "Archie
Bunkers" and other whites from the lower economic
strata who are thought to be too stupid, uneducated or
otherwise unsophisticated to understand the wonders and
marvels of the highbrow liberal multicultural philosophy.
Such people are indeed often unsophisticated, and frequently
exhibit strong negative emotions toward nonwhites, with
the result that they make themselves easy targets for
liberal anti-racists, who have little difficulty in holding
them up to contempt. As it happens, however, the liberals
are too clever by half. The very reason that lower-class
whites frequently exhibit such strong negative emotions
toward nonwhites is precisely because it is lower-class
whites who are the first to be directly threatened by
nonwhites. This is because it is those on the economic
margins who cannot afford to move to the suburbs to get
away from the urban decay which blacks and other minorities
inevitably bring; and thus it is these lower-class whites
who must contend on a daily basis with the frequently-uncivilized
behavior of such minorities. What all this means, then,
is that the liberals who pride themselves on "compassion"
for the "poor" and the "underclass"
in fact follow policies which damage poor and underclass
whites, but which leave the mostly-wealthy liberals unaffected.
No wonder the rednecks, skinheads and Archie Bunkers are
full of hate!
The urban decay which minorities bring -- and the hate
which it generates in the white underclass that has to
contend with it -- is actually part of a race war which
is going on not only in America, but in the entire Western
world. In fact, it is really more than a race war, since
groups other than races are involved: ethnic minorities,
women, homosexuals, the handicapped, children, and a great
many others, with yet others constantly entering the fray.
This war may perhaps better be characterized as a war
of political correctness versus political incorrectness,
or for simplicity, the PC war. But while this war has
the appearance of being fought "for" a large
number of disparate groups, even cursory examination leads
to the conclusion that the PC war is actually a war against
the white man and Western culture which he created. This
is not merely indicated by the fact that whites are constantly
denigrated as "racist" by the media mavens who
are pushing this war in every Western country, but also
because the powers-that-be who have embraced political
correctness as official policy have also embraced the
notion of erasing national boundaries -- boundaries which,
for all practical purposes, are the boundaries of white
nations. The significance of this erasure is that it will
cause the white nations -- along with their cultures and
genomes -- to disappear, both because of amalgamation
with other white nations and -- most importantly -- because
of Turd World immigration which national boundaries will
no longer be able to restrain, and which will occur as
a result of the attraction of Turd-Worlders for the easier
living (and especially the welfare benefits) of more wealthy
The obvious question raised by the above observations
is, What is fueling the PC war? While there is perhaps
no easy single answer, there are several factors which
are playing a major role. One of these is the economic
factor: Turd-Worlders work for less, and allowing open-border
immigration drives down wages which large corporations
have to pay, while permitting free trade allows companies
to relocate overseas in the midst of even cheaper labor.
Beyond this, the PC war gives large corporations a competitive
advantage over their smaller rivals: Implementing affirmative
action and other anti-racist programs costs money, and
smaller companies have more difficulty in meeting the
expenses than do the more-established ones.
Yet a second reason for the PC war is the abundance which
white Western culture has produced. This occurs because
white men -- unlike those of most other cultures -- possess
a compassionate nature which makes them sympathetic to
the less-fortunate, and this characteristic -- once exhibited
as a messianic zeal to convert "the lesser breeds
without the law" to Christianity and civilized ways
of living -- has been transmogrified in the present secular
age into a propensity toward welfare handouts, the relaxation
of immigration restrictions, and other behaviors which
ultimately endanger the very civilization which produced
the benefits for which Turd-Worlders so hunger.
Of equal if not greater importance than company economics
and Western abundance in fueling the PC war is a third
factor -- the Jewish community. Altho Jews make up less
than 3% of the American population, they are enormously
wealthy and powerful, and in addition have a strong ethnic
(or if you prefer, racial) identity. Furthermore, there
has been a long history of Jewish persecution by white
Christian culture, from well before the Inquisition to
WWII Germany; and this has bred into Jews a profound anti-gentile
mindset and a "never forgive, never forget"
and "eye for an eye" Talmudic mentality whose
logic seeks to repay the gentile community in kind for
the Jews' historic sufferings, even tho Jews have long
been accepted into Western society and most of those who
persecuted them are long since dead. Evidently, then,
Jews have both the means and the motive for fueling the
PC war; and while the subject of their involvement is
too complicated for this brief essay, the following are
some facts which deserve to be noted:
Communism was an essentially Jewish phenomenon, and constituted
a worldwide conspiracy for what amounts to Jewish political
In the late 1920s the American communist party decided
to deliberately promote racial strife with the view to
weakening America for a communist (hence Jewish) takeover.
For many of its early years, the major officials and
lawyers of the NAACP were Jews.
A large portion of the activists in the Civil Rights
movement were Jews.
Most of the major figures in the feminist movement were
Jews are a dominant force in newspapers, television and
Hollywood, and these media have incessantly promoted the
liberal anti-racist PC line.
Jews contribute more than half the operating funds of
the (liberal) Democratic Party, dominate the Congress
(Pat Buchanan called it "Israeli- occupied territory"),
and hold more than 50% of the appointed posts in the Clinton
In the present day, the major enemy of free speech --
a specially- cherished value of Western culture -- is
the Jewish community, which has forced passage of laws
against questioning the Orthodox Jewish Version of the
Holocaust in most of the countries of the Western world,
and which seeks to stifle free speech on the Internet
in the interests of political correctness.
In the paragraphs above we have pointed out that the
PC war is a war against the white race and Western culture
which whites created, and we also noted that, in many
respects, the PC war is a war of Jew against white gentile.
The PC war, then, is essentially a race war, and the survival
of what is arguably the world's greatest race -- a race
which is only 18% of the world's population, and hence
is itself a minority in this worldwide context -- hangs
in the balance.
And that's why I'm a white racist.